Win loss analysis without the consultant
Win-loss analysis is the most reliable source of competitive intelligence a company has, and the one most teams outsource, run once a year, and forget. The reasons you lost are sitting in call recordings, CRM notes, and the reply to the "sorry it didn't work out" email. Nobody reads them together.
In the final lesson of Competitive Intelligence 101, we cover how to run win-loss as a continuous practice rather than an annual project: which deals to look at, what to ask and who to ask, how to separate the stated reason from the real one, how to tie losses back to specific competitor moves, and how to feed what you learn into the battlecards from Lesson 04 so the loop closes.
Goes with this lessonSolutionWin/loss without interviews ›
What is said in this lesson
The spoken text from the video's captions, split into paragraphs. Read it in two minutes or search it for the part you need; the captions are automatic, so a word may be off here and there.
Show the transcript
Open your CRM and look at why you lost your last few deals. Let me guess, price or went with competitor. That field feels like an answer and it tells you almost nothing. In this final lesson, how to learn from the deals you lose. Then the whole course in 30 seconds. Here is the framework. Every deal has two causes and most teams record neither. The trigger is what started the evaluation. a renewal date, a new leader, a rivals offer. The reason is why the buyer chose the way they did.
Keep them apart. Price is often neither. It is what a buyer says when they would rather not explain. To find the real reasons, start with your signals, not a survey. Take a batch of recent closed deals, one and lost, roughly half and half. Read what you already hold on each one, the rep's notes, the call recordings, support tickets from trials, public reviews, and the dates of rival moves. Write the reason in the buyer's words before you name a category. Group reasons by the job the buyer was hiring for.
Keep the list short. If most deals land in other, the list is wrong, not the deals. Then interview to check your read, not to create it. Pick the deals where the signals disagree with the rep's reason. That is where the learning is. Ask someone neutral to run the call, not the rep who lost it. Say who you are and why you're asking and ask permission to take notes. Back to our rival. Several deals last quarter were logged as lost on price. Read the calls and buyers said something else.
We were worried about moving our data. They offered to move everything for us. The trigger was the rivals switching credit dated. The reason was not price. Switching felt safe with them and risky with you. So product improves the import. Sales adds the answer to the battle card and two quick interviews confirm the read. Three mistakes to avoid. First, trusting the drop down. A reason picked in a hurry is not evidence. Second, studying only losses. Wins tell you what to protect. Third, a quarterly report. Tag every closed deal within a week while the calls are fresh.
That completes the course. Lesson one, competitive intelligence is collect, make sense, deliver using public and legitimate information only. Lesson two, watch six signals across the rivals you actually meet. Lesson three, score every move on who, how much, and how fast, and look for the echo. Lesson four, one rival, one screen, five blocks. In the buyer's words, dated. Lesson five, learn why you lose, reason, and trigger from the evidence you already have. This week, take your last 10 lost deals. For each one, write the trigger and the reason in the buyer's words.
Compare them with the reason in your CRM. Pick two where they disagree and ask those buyers for a short call. Customer intelligence explained is presented by Hyperorbit, Agentic Customer Intelligence. Read the free win Josh loss method, then try Recon Free on one competitor source at hyperorbit.ai.
Every signal, on one orbit
Connect your first source in an afternoon. The first pass lands before your next standup.
Book a demo