Solutions | Roadmap prioritisation

A roadmap argued from revenue, not anecdotes.

HyperOrbit roadmap prioritisation ranks each theme by the revenue of the accounts asking for it. Every theme arrives priced against the accounts that raised it, with the competitor context and the renewal windows attached. The roadmap meeting starts from the same read.

Book a demo See Chorus
8 THEMES · PRICED BY ARR · 1 READ THE ROOM ARGUES FROM
The problem

The loudest anecdote wins

200 requests, no ranking

Sales, support, customers and executives each bring a list. None of them is priced.

Whose anecdote?

Roadmap debates are settled by who was in the last customer call, not by what customers said.

Competitive parity by rumour

“We need feature X to compete” with no evidence of which gaps cost deals.

How it lands

How HyperOrbit handles it

01 —

Themes, priced

Chorus clusters feedback into themes and prices each against the accounts that raised it.

THEMES8 FOUND · 35 SUB-THEMESOnboarding friction31 MENTIONSPricing18 MENTIONSSupport wait times12 MENTIONSIntegrations9 MENTIONS
02 —

Context attached

Recon adds the competitive gaps behind lost deals; Atlas adds the renewal windows.

THEMECRITICAL · 9 OF 100Pricing complaints tripled44 MENTIONS · 19 ACCOUNTS · $512K ARRNEGATIVE 59%NEUTRAL 31%POSITIVE 10%“We'd pay for the seats we use, not the seats we mightneed. The bundle math doesn't work for a 12-person team.”
03 —

Stories, owned

The top themes drafted as user stories with acceptance criteria, shipped to Jira or Linear.

NEEDS YOU3 · 2 HAVE A COMPETITOR BEHIND THEMSIGNALPricing complaints tripled — 44 mentions · $512K ARRCAUSEMicrosoft bundled Copilot into 365 E5, 5 days earlierACTIONDraft the pricing counter-brief; brief 4 renewing accountsWAITING ON YOUVOC + CIApprove
What you get

One read the whole room argues from

ARR per theme

Every candidate priced against the revenue behind it.

Demand by segment

Which segments want what, by volume and by value.

Competitive gaps

The gaps that cost deals, ranked, from Recon.

Renewal pressure

Which requests sit inside a renewal window, from Atlas.

Evidence trail

Every ranking traceable to the quote.

Stories drafted

Requirements with acceptance criteria, ready to ship.

What changes

The week gets shorter every cycle

8themes
from 100 records, priced
35sub-themes
underneath, each sourced to the quote
1read
the whole room argues from
Works with

Connect a source, and it is on the orbit that night

Six of the 76 connectors this surface reads from. Each connects once over OAuth and is read continuously.

  • JiraConnected
  • LinearConnected
  • Zendesk SupportConnected
  • IntercomConnected
  • G2Connected
  • GongConnected
View all connectors
FAQ

Before you connect

Does it replace my roadmap tool?

No. Stories ship to Jira, Linear or your roadmap tool with the evidence attached. HyperOrbit is where the ranking is made, not where the roadmap lives.

How is a theme priced?

By the ARR of the accounts whose records make it up, weighted by sentiment and renewal proximity, with the confidence shown.

How long does setup take?

Most connectors: 5 to 10 minutes over OAuth. Custom enterprise sources: 2 to 3 weeks with a dedicated engineer.

What can the agents never do on their own?

Act on anything touching pricing or an account inside its renewal window. Those stop and ask, in every autonomy mode.

What does “argued from revenue” mean?

Every theme shows the accounts and ARR behind it, so the roadmap debate starts from exposure rather than the loudest anecdote.

Does it consider competitors?

Yes. Recon’s moves sit beside Chorus’s themes, so a request that spiked after a competitor shipped it is visible as one story.

Can I export the ranking?

Themes and their evidence can go to your backlog tool. Enterprise includes integrations such as Jira.

Every signal, on one orbit

Connect your first source in an afternoon. The first pass lands before your next standup.

Book a demo